|
|
Tourniquet
regular
Reg'd: Fri
Posts: 1642
Loc: Under Your Bed
|
|
http://www.freewebs.com/zahracalagui/
Love ya all! This is My mates Zara's web site and I would be honuerd if u vistited, many thanks XxX Love you! Kirsty Louise M B!
Tourniquet 
I love Phil!...
XxX Kirsty Louise XxX
Edited by greysts on 23/05/2004 19:18 (server time).
|
|
greysts
regular
Reg'd: Thu
Posts: 17746
Loc: Colchester
|
|
Question is, have you asked Zahra for her permission to put her site on this forum. The title for this thread is Readers' Websites which means that only the owner of the site should post. I know Zahra is a reader and a member of the forum but nevertheless you should still ask her to agree. No doubt she will respond very quickly.
|
TheFatControlleR
Forum Admin
Reg'd: Fri
Posts: 6556
Loc: Megatripolis
|
|
In addition, this forum is intended to invite criticism, and not everyone is comfortable with that. That's why the owner should be the poster.
 TFC
Nothing is a problem for me... 
|
Barney_Rubble
regular
Reg'd: Tue
Posts: 2699
|
|
Quite a good looking front page though, but I'm wondering why I've got a "Restricted Sites" icon showing. The only sites I've got in the Restricted Sites zone are the ones put there by Spyware Blaster.
Perhaps it's the host.
Barney's Place - There is intelligent life on Earth, but I'm only visiting.
|
Tourniquet
regular
Reg'd: Fri
Posts: 1642
Loc: Under Your Bed
|
|
I pmed Zarha ( I think thats how u spell her name ) She said it was okeys!!!...
I love Phil!...
XxX Kirsty Louise XxX
|
ciderlad
regular
Reg'd: Wed
Posts: 50
|
|
SpywareBlaster definition Restricted Sites
Coolwebsearch (382) Freewebs.com
So am i right in thinking anyone who clicked on that link without spywareBlaster protection or another form of protection would they get infected with a coolwebsearch variant?
Just asking.
|
greysts
regular
Reg'd: Thu
Posts: 17746
Loc: Colchester
|
|
Good question. I don't know the answer, anybody out there who does?
|
Tourniquet
regular
Reg'd: Fri
Posts: 1642
Loc: Under Your Bed
|
|
Its not mine or Zarhas fault ...
I love Phil!...
XxX Kirsty Louise XxX
|
greysts
regular
Reg'd: Thu
Posts: 17746
Loc: Colchester
|
|
I don't think anybody is accusing you or Zahra of deliberately infecting other computers. We're not even sure if there is a problem yet. Just hang on in there until an expert can give us an opinion. (Owen or Puta?)
|
ciderlad
regular
Reg'd: Wed
Posts: 50
|
|
No i am not accusing you Tourniquet,i was just following up on barneys post as to why spywareblaster had put it in the restricted sites zone.
I don't think it would be in spywareblasters restricted sites list if it was harmless.
Like greysts says lets wait till puta or someone comes along and gives an opinion.
|
owen
regular
Reg'd: Thu
Posts: 3236
Loc: Lancashire, United Kingdom
|
|
It is possible that they are no longer a CWS Affiliate but they are listed as a CWS Affiliate and could possibly still be spreading CWS Variants. It does sound like they distribute tracking cookies though. There privacy policy can be viewed here.
Owen,
http://www.isecurity.org.uk
"Don't be content with things as they are. The earth is yours and the fullness therof"- Winston Churchill
|
greysts
regular
Reg'd: Thu
Posts: 17746
Loc: Colchester
|
|
I've been to the site and none of my various protection progs indicated anything untoward. You can still view the main pages of the site with cookies turned off so I'm reasobaly happy that we don't have a problem.
|
owen
regular
Reg'd: Thu
Posts: 3236
Loc: Lancashire, United Kingdom
|
|
Thats probably because your patched against the vulnerability in question, but i agree, I think its quite safe.
Owen,
http://www.isecurity.org.uk
"Don't be content with things as they are. The earth is yours and the fullness therof"- Winston Churchill
|
putasolutions
regular
Reg'd: Tue
Posts: 12178
Loc: Infinity and beyond
|
|
Spywareguard showed nothing in the logs, and did a spybot check and HJT straight after visiting, and nothing showed, so I think that a cautious all clear can be given
Please post your query to the boards, so that others can learn
Remember there is no such thing as a simple question, just a question you don't know the answer to, though they are the easiest to answer 
|
ciderlad
regular
Reg'd: Wed
Posts: 50
|
|
I take it that you have spywareBlaster 1.3 installed puta?.
So you would be protected against the vulnerability wouldnt you?.
SpywareBlaster is doing what it claims to do,stopping spyware from getting on your pc which is good news for users who have it installed on there pc's and bad news for users who dont.
Edited by ciderlad on 26/05/2004 09:32 (server time).
|
putasolutions
regular
Reg'd: Tue
Posts: 12178
Loc: Infinity and beyond
|
|
No I don't have spywareblaster installed on the machine, just Spybot 1.3, and set to warn Log showed no browser hijack attempt
Please post your query to the boards, so that others can learn
Remember there is no such thing as a simple question, just a question you don't know the answer to, though they are the easiest to answer
|
owen
regular
Reg'd: Thu
Posts: 3236
Loc: Lancashire, United Kingdom
|
|
I think this is quite enough. This comes close to STS level. It makes it sound like you are criticising the persons work. The site is ok, so they must no longer be an affiliate of CWS. Please don't drag this on any longer because it puts the owner of the site in a bad position that its not nice to be in.
Owen,
http://www.isecurity.org.uk
Useful Diagnostics:
Disable System Restore
Post a Hijack This Log
Download ALL Critical Updates and Service Packs
Show Hidden Files and Folders
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
Edit
Reply
Quote
